Crusty old Joe's

Kodiak Alaska Military History



The official web site of the Kodiak Military History Museum


THE NATURALIST
by Dave Evans

With a Little Help from My Friends
August 16, 2004

When I'm asked to describe Kodiak, one of my snap responses is "Big dogs riding in pickup trucks." And I'll usually go on to describe a combination that might be even more specific to the Island: the Kodiak triad of one big dog along with two tiny dogs to act as bookends. The association of dogs and humans qualifies as an example of mutualism, a close relationship between two different species in which each of the participants benefits. In the dog-human mutualism, both species gain companionship or even a reciprocal protection that is biologically valuable. There may also be direct benefits to the dog of food and shelter, and to the human of help with hauling, herding or hunting.

Katrina Refior and Axl the Dog
Katrina Refior and Axl the Dog
Mutualism is probably more widespread than we suspect. Earlier emphasis in biological study was on relationships in which one or both participants were at a disadvantage. Competition, predation, and parasitism were our main models of species interaction. Mutualism, though, can be subtle, and biologists are looking at aspects such as evolutionary origins of the association, the magnitude of benefit to each participant, and the stability of the relationship. What, for example, keeps one of the members from taking too much advantage of the relationship, placing the other participant at a disadvantage?

A walk around Fort Abercrombie State Historical Park is a chance to observe mutualistic relationships first hand. They turn out to be everywhere. Flowers in the Wildflower Meadow are pollinated by nectar- and pollen-seeking bees and flies. Old Man's Beard, hanging down from the spruce branches, is a lichen-sort of a combination organism formed from the mutualistic relationship between an alga and a fungus.

One of the most interesting and unsung, even obscure, mutualisms I've come across is one we observe in our tidepooling forays along Monashka Bay. The tidepools there have the greatest sea star diversity I've ever encountered. Our sea stars range from the giant sunflower stars to miniature 6-rayed stars to Kodiak's own postcard sea star-the brilliant scarlet blood stars.

Sea stars have hundreds of suction cup-equipped tube feet on the underside of the body. Tube feet are what they use both to move and feed, the suction cups attaching to the prey and manipulating it to the center mouth opening. Feeding consists of indelicately projecting the entire stomach through the mouth, surrounding the unfortunate bivalve or snail with it, digesting the meal outside of the body, and finally bringing the stomach (which surrounds what is now an organic soup) back in through the mouth. Sea stars don't use napkins, so bits of half-digested food swirl around the area where the everted stomach and the tube feet are doing their work.

It doesn't take long for tidepoolers to notice that some of the most common sea stars have segmented scaleworms firmly nestled among the tube feet, or crawling up and down along the underside of the rays. The pattern seems just too consistent to be an accidental encounter between worm and sea star. This relationship turns out to be another example of mutualism. Scaleworms and sea stars of particular species associate together. The advantage to the scaleworm is evident: it gains habitat, protection, and access to those tasty bits of food that the sea star lets cascade out of its mouth and stomach. The sea star gains from the relationship, as well. Scaleworms keep the rows of tube feet free of debris or undigested food, and they even play a protective role. Sea stars are preyed upon by some snails and even by other sea stars. The scaleworm will move over to the area being attacked and nip the predator repeatedly with a pair of sharp jaws.

Where did this relationship come from and where is it going? Was it initially a chance encounter that ended up providing benefits for both participants? Could it have been the beginnings of parasitism that turned out to be even more beneficial to those worms that provided advantages to the host? Will one of the participants become more efficient in this relationship, perhaps at the expense of the other, causing this mutualism to slide into a parasitic or predatory relationship?

Cooperative relationships between different species take many forms. The relationships are also capable of changing. Perhaps a curious and hungry scaleworm will sample a tube foot or two. Maybe our pickup truck dogs will give us that needed companionship, but only if we let them start using our credit cards. Kodiak shows us some fine examples of mutualism, but describing those associations is only the first step in addressing an array of intriguing biological questions.

David A. Evans, Summer Naturalist
Fort Abercrombie State Historical Park.


http://www.kadiak.org/naturalist/mutualism.html Updated 2004 August 17

www.ka diak.org